Technologieoffenheit und Realisierungsquote im Rechtsvergleich zwischen deutschen EEG-Ausschreibungen und brasilianischen Stromauktionen (Record no. 34259)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03793naaaa2200337uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64564
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220219180856.0
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number /doi.org/10.30819/5215
024 7# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code https://doi.org/10.30819/5215
Terms of availability doi
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title German
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
072 #7 - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code LA
Source bicssc
072 #7 - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code TQ
Source bicssc
072 #7 - SUBJECT CATEGORY CODE
Subject category code JP
Source bicssc
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Berthold, Lennart
Relationship auth
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Technologieoffenheit und Realisierungsquote im Rechtsvergleich zwischen deutschen EEG-Ausschreibungen und brasilianischen Stromauktionen
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Logos Verlag Berlin
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2020
506 0# - RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS NOTE
Terms governing access Open Access
Source of term star
Standardized terminology for access restriction Unrestricted online access
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Diese Arbeit systematisiert die bereits im Jahr 2005 eingeführten brasilianischen Stromauktionen erstmals umfassend und bewertet sie anhand von Experteninterviews und empirischen Erhebungen. Aus dem funktionalen Rechtsvergleich mit dem deutschen Ausschreibungsmodell ergeben sich wesentliche Erkenntnisse für das EEG 2017 im Bereich der Technologieoffenheit und der Realisierungsquote bezuschlagter Projekte. Denn die EEG-Ausschreibungen verstoßen infolge niedriger Teilnehmerzahlen in weiten Teilen gegen die unionsrechtliche Vorgabe der EE-Richtlinie 2018 zur wettbewerbsorientierten Vergabe von Fördermitteln. Zudem verfehlen sie die national gesetzten Ausbauziele. Als Lösungsvorschlag wird ein auf den brasilianischen Vorschriften basierender Regelungsentwurf zur automatischen technologieübergreifenden Umverteilung der ausgeschriebenen Leistung erarbeitet. Ferner zeigt diese Arbeit auf, dass die Regelungen des EEG 2017 Projektabbrüche kaum sanktionieren. Daher sollte erwogen werden, nach brasilianischem Vorbild Projektabbrüche mit dem Ausschluss von zukünftigen Ausschreibungen zu pönalisieren. A functional legal comparison of German renewable energy auctions, introduced comprehensively in 2017, with Brazilian energy auctions, introduced already in 2005, provides relevant insights for the German system. This work offers the first comprehensive systematisation of relevant Brazilian regulations, and assesses their effectiveness using expert interviews and empirical analysis. It highlights several solutions to problems regarding technology neutral auctions and the realisation rate of successful projects, that could be valuable for the German model. Due to low participant numbers, many German energy auctions violate the european energy directive of 2018, which states that the awarding of funding must be competition-oriented. This work proposes a solution to this problem, based on a similar mechanism adopted by Brazilian regulations, which automatically redistributes tendered capacity across different technologies. Legal comparisons made in this work demonstrate that project cancellations in Germany are not sanctioned sufficiently. As such, to ensure that expansion targets are met, it is worth considering following the Brazilian example of sanctioning project cancellations by limiting participation in future auctions.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction Creative Commons
Use and reproduction rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Source of term cc
-- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note German
650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Jurisprudence & general issues
Source of heading or term bicssc
650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Environmental science, engineering & technology
Source of heading or term bicssc
650 #7 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Politics & government
Source of heading or term bicssc
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Law
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Technology & Engineering
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Environmental
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Political Science
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47790/1/external_content.pdf">https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/47790/1/external_content.pdf</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: download the publication
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64564">https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/64564</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: description of the publication

No items available.