Autonomy: a Matter of Content (Record no. 61147)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02789naaaa2200253uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41669
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220220030341.0
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 978-88-8453-636-5
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9788884536365
024 7# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.36253/978-88-8453-636-5
Terms of availability doi
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Raffaela Giovagnoli
Relationship auth
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Autonomy: a Matter of Content
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Firenze University Press
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2007
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 1 electronic resource (142 p.)
506 0# - RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS NOTE
Terms governing access Open Access
Source of term star
Standardized terminology for access restriction Unrestricted online access
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Autonomy is the core of a lively debate on moral and political philosophy, where many competing perspectives and conceptual distinctions are presented. Several authors tend to override the metaphysical questions of determinism and free will: this is the right step for emphasizing the dimensions of individual choice as well as the role of socialization in developing capacities for critical reflection. In this context, the most important distinction is between "moral" autonomy and "personal" autonomy. Generally speaking, the theorists of personal autonomy try to give an account of autonomy that is conceived not only as moral agency. This move allows the consideration of several patterns of practical reasoning that imply several kinds of reasons for acting. The argumentation considers the discussion between "procedural" and "substantive" theories. Procedural theories emphasize the structural conditions of the process of "identification" with one's own motives. Even if these conditions are relevant, substantive theories rightly point to the role of the content of our reasons for autonomous agency. This perspective requires substantive standards according to which we can recognize and criticize oppressive norms. The main theoretical proposal of this work is to show the normative requirements for autonomy. An intersubjective model is promising if we consider socialization from the point of view of the process through which we develop the cognitive and moral capacities necessary for autonomy. The "scorekeeping" model, (an original variant of Wittgenstein's linguistic game as proposed by Robert Brandom) seems to offer the deontic structure of discursive practices in which the agents have the possibility of discussing and criticizing their own and others' reasons.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction Creative Commons
Use and reproduction rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Source of term cc
-- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Sociologia
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Politica
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Filosofia
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.fupress.com/redir.ashx?RetUrl=1398_21546.pdf">https://www.fupress.com/redir.ashx?RetUrl=1398_21546.pdf</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: download the publication
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41669">https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/41669</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: description of the publication

No items available.