Rating EFL Written Performance (Record no. 64411)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02221naaaa2200289uu 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57628
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20220220041256.0
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9788376560793
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9788376560793
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9783110399288
024 7# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.2478/9788376560793
Terms of availability doi
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title English
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Bukta, Katalin
Relationship auth
245 10 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Rating EFL Written Performance
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. De Gruyter
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2013
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 1 electronic resource (424 p.)
506 0# - RESTRICTIONS ON ACCESS NOTE
Terms governing access Open Access
Source of term star
Standardized terminology for access restriction Unrestricted online access
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The study focuses on the investigation of the process during which raters of EFL written performance make their decisions. It consists of a pilot and a main study, each of which concentrates on assessment of writing. The rationale is to detect the decision-making processes that raters follow, which can be used for training raters, and with which the reliability of rating can be improved. The pilot study is based on data collected during a large-scale language proficiency assessment of two age groups from learners of English and German languages. Raters were asked to think aloud during the rating task. Data was then transcribed and analysed. The participants in the main study were novice raters, who produced verbal protocols. 37 EFL teacher trainees took part in rater training and practised think-aloud protocol production. Then, they evaluated ten compositions written by EFL learners and verbalised their thought processes. The verbal protocols served as a basis for data collection. The analysis of data resulted in the conclusion according to which more reliable and objective assessment is possible when evaluating written performance.
540 ## - TERMS GOVERNING USE AND REPRODUCTION NOTE
Terms governing use and reproduction Creative Commons
Use and reproduction rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Source of term cc
-- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE
Language note English
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term EFL written performance
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term language performance
653 ## - INDEX TERM--UNCONTROLLED
Uncontrolled term Testing
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560793">https://doi.org/10.2478/9788376560793</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: download the publication
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name www.oapen.org
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57628">https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/57628</a>
Access status 0
Public note DOAB: description of the publication

No items available.