000 03827naaaa2200349uu 4500
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/55526
005 20220219194543.0
020 _abooks978-3-03842-715-5
020 _a9783038427155
020 _a978038427162
024 7 _a10.3390/books978-3-03842-715-5
_cdoi
041 0 _aEnglish
042 _adc
100 1 _aEdward J. Pavlik (Ed.)
_4auth
245 1 0 _aOvarian Cancer Screening
260 _bMDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
_c2018
300 _a1 electronic resource (VI, 124 p.)
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _aPresented here are scientific reports which add considerable information to the area of early stage ovarian cancer detection and the application of this detection to ovarian cancer screening. In this volume, the following presentations are made: 1) The performance of different ultrasound-based International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) strategies is analyzed to discriminate between early stage ovarian malignancy and benign abnormalities of the ovary. 2) Since oophorectomy confers protection against ovarian cancer, when adjustment for oophorectomy was made, rates of ovarian cancer were substantially higher. 3) The frequency of symptoms relevant to ovarian cancer was found to be more than two-hundred times higher than the occurrence of ovarian cancer and it was found that 80.1% of women expressed confidence in the symptoms they reported. 4) Complications resulting from surgery performed in the Kentucky Ovarian Cancer Screening Program were infrequent and significantly fewer than reported in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening trial. Complications observed were mostly minor (93%) and were more common in cancer versus non-cancer surgery. 5) Arguments in favor of serial ultrasonography as an alternative to immediate surgery are presented and illustrate the benefits of surveillance. 6) Ten critical considerations for ovarian cancer screening are presented in depth, highlighting their important bearing on ovarian screening outcomes and their interpretations. 7) Considerations that have psychological and behavioral impacts on individuals participating in ovarian screening suggest that a “normal” screening test result can have psychological benefits, including an increased positive effect and beliefs in the efficacy of screening. 8) The efficacy of ovarian cancer screening may be higher in Asia than in Europe and the USA. Additionally, the re-analysis of PLCO screening data, when cancers presenting more than one year after screening are excluded, shows a significant survival benefit in the PLCO screening trial. 9) The effect that ovarian cancer has on patients and their families is examined from the perspective of a first-year resident in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 10) The 50-year history of biomarkers and ultrasound in the context of ovarian cancer indicates the importance of serial application of both biomarkers and ultrasound. Taken together, this volume provides both original data and overviews of ovarian cancer screening studies that enhance the present interpretation of this type of screening.
540 _aCreative Commons
_fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
_2cc
_4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546 _aEnglish
653 _atreatment
653 _acollateral affectors
653 _acosts
653 _ascreening
653 _aendpoints
653 _atrail design
653 _aovarian cancer
653 _aefficacy
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttp://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfview/book/567
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/55526
_70
_zDOAB: description of the publication
999 _c39505
_d39505