000			02934naaaa2200325uu 4500
001			https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43212
005			20220219213753.0
020			_a978-989-26-1671-1
020			_a9789892616704
024	7		_a10.14195/978-989-26-1671-1 _cdoi
041	0		_aPortuguese
042			_adc
100	1		_aMarcos Martinho _4auth
700	1		_aIsabella Tardin Cardoso _4auth
245	1	0	_aCícero: Obra e Recepção
260			_bCoimbra University Press _c2018
300			_a1 electronic resource (236 p.)
506	0		_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access
520			_aThe book brings together seven essays on Cicero written by specialists in the Author. The essays are grouped into two sections: the first one presents papers on Cicero’s works (the dialogues: Lucullus, De finibus, De oratore, De officiis); the papers in the second one discuss on both the early and late reception of Cicero (in Seneca, Petrarch and Erasmus). The authors are professors from Brazilian (Adriano Scatolin, Bianca Fanelli Morganti, Elaine Cristine Sartorelli, Sidney Calheiros de Lima), French (Carlos Lévy) and Italian universities (Aldo Setaioli, Ermanno Malaspina). The book avoids traditional biographical approach, which tends to take the works of Cicero as a reliable witness of political and family events, sometimes distrusts them as a distorted picture of public and private actors. The essays here assembled also avoid conceiving Cicero’s works as either the Author’s profession of faith in a philosophical doctrine, or a tendentious presentation of the theses of philosophical schools. Instead, the contributors adopt another interpretative key, so that, when analyzing a philosophical dialogue of Cicero, instead of seeking references to its historical moment, focus on its controversial aspects (due to the dispute between the schools of philosophy), rhetorical aspects (the amplifying devices through which the Author compares the strength of one thesis with the weakness of another), fictional aspects (including the description of the scene and the picture of the characters). Thus, it can be said that the book seeks a more appropriate approach to Cicero’s works, not taking them as mere source of historical knowledge, but considering their historicity, that is, the devices for discursive production of their own time.
540			_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ _2cc _4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546			_aPortuguese
653			_aPhilology
653			_aHistoriography
653			_aPhilosophy
653			_aRhetoric
653			_aReception
653			_aCicero
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1671-1 _70 _zDOAB: download the publication
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/43212 _70 _zDOAB: description of the publication
999			_c45393 _d45393