| 000 | 03963naaaa2200529uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33319 | ||
| 020 | _aacprof:oso/9780199606610.001.0001 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606610.001.0001 _cdoi |
|
| 041 | 0 | _aEnglish | |
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_a1QFE _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aJPSN2 _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLBBM _2bicssc |
|
| 072 | 7 |
_aLND _2bicssc |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_aMendez, Mario _4auth |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe Legal Effects of EU Agreements |
| 260 |
_bOxford University Press _c2013 |
||
| 300 | _a1 electronic resource (399 p.) | ||
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access |
|
| 520 | _aExamining the legal effects of EU concluded treaties, this book provides an analysis of this increasingly important and rapidly growing area of EU law. The EU has concluded more than 1,000 treaties including recently its first human rights treaty (the UN Rights of Persons with Disability Convention). These agreements are regularly invoked in litigation in the Courts of the member states and before the EU courts in Luxembourg but their ramifications for the EU legal order and that of the member states remains underexplored. Through analysis of over 300 cases, the book finds evidence of a twin-track approach whereby the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) adopts a maximalist approach to Treaty enforcement, where EU agreements are invoked in challenges to member state level action whilst largely insulating EU action from meaningful review vis-à-vis agreements. The book also reveals novel findings regarding the use of EU agreements in EU level litigation including: the types and which specific EU agreements (including the types of provisions) have arisen in litigation; the nature of the proceedings (preliminary rulings or direct actions) and the number of occasions in which they have been addressed in challenges to member state or EU action and the outcomes; who has been litigating (individuals, institutions, or member states) and which domestic courts have been referring questions to the CJEU. The significance of the judicial developments in this area are situated within the context of the domestic constitutional ramifications for member state legal orders thus revealing a neglected dimension in the constitutionalization debates, which traditionally emphasized the ramifications of internal EU law for the domestic constitutional order without expressly accommodating the constitutional significance of this external category of EU law nor the different challenges that this poses domestically. | ||
| 540 |
_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ _2cc _4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
||
| 546 | _aEnglish | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_aEU (European Union) _2bicssc |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aEU & European institutions _2bicssc |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aInternational economic & trade law _2bicssc |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aConstitutional & administrative law _2bicssc |
|
| 653 | _aeu courts | ||
| 653 | _atreaty enforcement | ||
| 653 | _aconstitutionalization | ||
| 653 | _amember states | ||
| 653 | _aeu level litigation | ||
| 653 | _acjeu | ||
| 653 | _adomestic courts | ||
| 653 | _aeu law | ||
| 653 | _aeu concluded treaties | ||
| 653 | _aCreative Commons | ||
| 653 | _aDirect effect of European Union law | ||
| 653 | _aEuropean Court of Justice | ||
| 653 | _aEuropean Union | ||
| 653 | _aEuropean Union law | ||
| 653 | _aGeneral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade | ||
| 653 | _aInternational law | ||
| 653 | _aWorld Trade Organization | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33858/1/453475.pdf _70 _zDOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33858/1/453475.pdf _70 _zDOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/33319 _70 _zDOAB: description of the publication |
| 999 |
_c50301 _d50301 |
||