000 03613naaaa2200421uu 4500
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29600
005 20220219234405.0
041 0 _aFinnish
042 _adc
072 7 _aJFD
_2bicssc
072 7 _aRNP
_2bicssc
100 1 _aKumpu, Ville
_4auth
245 1 0 _aYmpäristö, politiikka ja julkisuus : Kolme tapaustutkimusta journalistisen julkisuuden rakentumisesta ja merkityksestä ympäristöpolitiikassa
260 _aTampere
_bTampere University Press
_c2020
300 _a1 electronic resource (180 p.)
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _a"Drawing on the debate on mediatization of politics this study identifies cultural meanings, institutional practices and styles of argumentation as three theoretical dimensions that illuminate both the construction of journalistic publicity and its potential uses in political action. Based on the theoretical model, environmental politics is identified as a specific context for mediatization. In environmental politics, the interplay of cultural meanings, institutional practices and styles of argumentation define the construction and use of journalistic publicity in a way that differs from other fields of politics. The empirical part of this study analyzes the newspaper coverage of three Finnish environmental conflicts from 1971, 1994 and 2012. The theoretical model is transformed into an analytical framework that focuses on discursive construction of the conflicts (cultural meanings), journalistic frames, narration and opinion-giving in the coverage of the conflicts and the publicity practices adopted by actors during the conflicts (institutional practices) and legitimation of arguments (styles of argumentation). According to this study, the relation between media and politics in the field of environmental politics is defined by the increasing cultural significance of environmental protection from the 1970s to the present. In the newspaper coverage of the three environmental conflicts studied, changes on the frames, narration and opinion-giving of journalism resonated with this cultural change. However, the significance of environmental protection in the framing, narration and opinion-giving of journalism was greater in the national newspaper studied compared to the local newspapers selected based on their proximity to the conflict sites. Styles of argumentation appeared to be more case dependent. The increasing cultural significance of environmental protection did not have a clear effect on how arguments were legitimated. "
540 _aCreative Commons
_fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
_2cc
_4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
546 _aFinnish
650 7 _aMedia studies
_2bicssc
650 7 _aPollution & threats to the environment
_2bicssc
653 _amedia coverage
653 _ajournalism
653 _apublicity
653 _aenvironmental politics
653 _amediatization
653 _aenvironmental problems
653 _acase study
653 _ajulkisuus
653 _aympäristöpolitiikka
653 _ajournalismi
653 _amedioituminen
653 _aympäristöongelmat
653 _aympäristöjournalismi
653 _atapaustutkimus
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/22808/4/Kumpu_Ymp%c3%a4rist%c3%b6_politiikka_ja_julkisuus.pdf
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29600
_70
_zDOAB: description of the publication
999 _c51685
_d51685