000 03863naaaa2200517uu 4500
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/38646
020 _aOAPEN_458896
024 7 _a10.26530/OAPEN_458896
_cdoi
041 0 _aEnglish
042 _adc
072 7 _aJP
_2bicssc
100 1 _aHunt, Janet
_4edt
700 1 _aSmith, Diane
_4edt
700 1 _aGarling, Stephanie
_4edt
700 1 _aSanders, Will
_4edt
700 1 _aHunt, Janet
_4oth
700 1 _aSmith, Diane
_4oth
700 1 _aGarling, Stephanie
_4oth
700 1 _aSanders, Will
_4oth
245 1 0 _aContested Governance: Culture, power and institutions in Indigenous Australia
260 _aCanberra
_bANU Press
_c2008
300 _a1 electronic resource (351 p.)
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _aIt is gradually being recognised by both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians that getting contemporary Indigenous governance right is fundamental to improving Indigenous well-being and generating sustained socioeconomic development. This collection of papers examines the dilemmas and challenges involved in the Indigenous struggle for the development and recognition of systems of governance that they recognise as both legitimate and effective. The authors highlight the nature of the contestation and negotiation between Australian governments, their agents, and Indigenous groups over the appropriateness of different governance processes, values and practices, and over the application of related policy, institutional and funding frameworks within Indigenous affairs. The long-term, comparative study reported in this monograph has been national in coverage, and community and regional in focus. It has pulled together a multidisciplinary team to work with partner communities and organisations to investigate Indigenous governance arrangements–the processes, structures, scales, institutions, leadership, powers, capacities, and cultural foundations–across rural, remote and urban settings. This ethnographic case study research demonstrates that Indigenous and non-Indigenous governance systems are intercultural in respect to issues of power, authority, institutions and relationships. It documents the intended and unintended consequences–beneficial and negative–arising for both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians from the realities of contested governance. The findings suggest that the facilitation of effective, legitimate governance should be a policy, funding and institutional imperative for all Australian governments. This research was conducted under an Australian Research Council Linkage Project, with Reconciliation Australia as Industry Partner.
540 _aAll rights reserved
_4http://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aPolitics & government
_2bicssc
653 _apolitics and government
653 _aaustralia
653 _asocial conditions
653 _aaboriginal australians
653 _aeconomic conditions
653 _acommunity development
653 _aACGC Chemical Research Communications
653 _aIndigenous Australians
653 _aIndigenous peoples
653 _aLocal government
653 _aNoongar
653 _aWadeye
653 _aNorthern Territory
653 _aYolngu
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33788/1/458896.pdf
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33788/1/458896.pdf
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/33788/1/458896.pdf
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/38646
_70
_zDOAB: description of the publication
999 _c56921
_d56921