000 03303naaaa2200397uu 4500
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/51030
005 20220220055025.0
020 _abooks.irasec.241
020 _a9782355960154
024 7 _a10.4000/books.irasec.241
_cdoi
041 0 _aEnglish
042 _adc
100 1 _aCarine Jaquet
_4auth
245 1 0 _aThe Kachin Conflict : Testing the Limits of the Political Transition in Myanmar
260 _bInstitut de recherche sur l’Asie du Sud-Est contemporaine
_c2015
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _aFighting in Kachin state flared back up just months after President Thien Sein came to power in March 2011. The new government almost immediately began negotiating a series of peace agreements with ethnic armed groups declaring that the signature of a nationwide ceasefire with all ethnic armed groups would be a priority for this first civilian administration. By convincing the majority of groups involved in armed struggle against the Tatmadaw to sign ceasefire agreements, the predominantly civilian government succeeded in winning some credibility, both nationally and internationally. At the same time, several old fault lines have re-emerged, among them the conflict in Kachin and Northern Shan States. The roots of the conflict in Kachin State between the KIO and government troops go back to grievances over control of the territory (and its lucrative natural resources) and the preservation of ethnic identity after the end of British colonial rule in 1948. The rekindling of this old conflict, after seventeen years of ceasefire, serves as a powerful reminder of the fragility of certain aspects of the transition process. The setback to conflict and blockage of peace process with the Kachin Independence Organisation (KIO) and its Army (KIA) show that some structural political issues remain, such as the recognition of local power structures and decentralization. While much has been written in the media about the legal, economic, and political reforms in Myanmar; academic research about the Kachin Conflict, as well as firsthand information remains scarce. Analyzing the causes of the conflict and current impediments to peace in Kachin territories provides an illustration of the limits of the transition process. This research examines the personal experiences of a strong sample of influential Kachin people, shows the complexity of notions of war and peace in the collective Kachin memory, as well as the reinterpretation of these by local leadership for political ends.
540 _aAll rights reserved
_4http://oapen.org/content/about-rights
546 _aEnglish
653 _aMyanmar
653 _apolitics
653 _adevelopment
653 _aKachin state
653 _aminorities
653 _aBurma
653 _aethnic conflict
653 _amarginalization
653 _aarmy
653 _apolitical transition
653 _acentralization
653 _amilitary
653 _astate
653 _atatmadaw
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttp://books.openedition.org/irasec/241
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/51030
_70
_zDOAB: description of the publication
999 _c68916
_d68916