| 000 | 01661naaaa2200325uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69862 | ||
| 005 | 20220220090512.0 | ||
| 020 | _a9783110726268 | ||
| 020 | _a9783110726268 | ||
| 020 | _a9783110726374 | ||
| 020 | _a9783110726831 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1515/9783110726268 _cdoi |
|
| 041 | 0 | _aGerman | |
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 072 | 7 |
_aCF _2bicssc |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_avon der Becke, Tanja _4auth |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aSemantische Spezialisierung vs. Polysemie : Interpretationsbesonderheiten bei Komplementreduktionen lexikalischer Einheiten |
| 260 |
_bDe Gruyter _c2021 |
||
| 300 | _a1 electronic resource (366 p.) | ||
| 506 | 0 |
_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access |
|
| 520 | _aTransitive verbs can often leave their arguments implicit. Until now, the objectless variants of these verbs have been frequently associated with specific meanings. This volume demonstrates that most verbs have different interpretations with different valency frames and specific conditions for omission. Accordingly, statements about omission and their semantic consequences must be applied to the interpretations of a verb. | ||
| 540 |
_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ _2cc _4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
||
| 546 | _aGerman | ||
| 650 | 7 |
_alinguistics _2bicssc |
|
| 653 | _aArgument omission | ||
| 653 | _apolysemy | ||
| 653 | _averb valency | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726268 _70 _zDOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/69862 _70 _zDOAB: description of the publication |
| 999 |
_c77625 _d77625 |
||