000 03831naaaa2200613uu 4500
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/77937
005 20220220102400.0
020 _amitpress/11023.001.0001
020 _a9780262344845
020 _a9780262037044
024 7 _a10.7551/mitpress/11023.001.0001
_cdoi
041 0 _aEnglish
042 _adc
072 7 _aPDR
_2bicssc
072 7 _aTBX
_2bicssc
100 1 _aShafiee, Katayoun
_4auth
245 1 0 _aMachineries of Oil : An Infrastructural History of BP in Iran
260 _aCambridge
_bThe MIT Press
_c2018
300 _a1 electronic resource (360 p.)
506 0 _aOpen Access
_2star
_fUnrestricted online access
520 _aThe emergence of the international oil corporation as a political actor in the twentieth century, seen in BP's infrastructure and information arrangements in Iran. In the early twentieth century, international oil corporations emerged as a new kind of political actor. The development of the world oil industry, argues Katayoun Shafiee, was one of the era's largest political projects of techno-economic development. In this book, Shafiee maps the machinery of oil operations in the Anglo-Iranian oil industry between 1901 and 1954, tracking the organizational work involved in moving oil through a variety of technical, legal, scientific, and administrative networks. She shows that, in a series of disagreements, the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC, which later became BP) relied on various forms of information management to transform political disputes into techno-economic calculation, guaranteeing the company complete control over profits, labor, and production regimes. She argues that the building of alliances and connections that constituted Anglo-Iranian oil's infrastructure reconfigured local politics of oil regions and examines how these arrangements in turn shaped the emergence of both nation-state and transnational oil corporation. Drawing on her extensive archival and field research in Iran, Shafiee investigates the surprising ways in which nature, technology, and politics came together in battles over mineral rights; standardizing petroleum expertise; formulas for calculating profits, production rates, and labor; the “Persianization” of employees; nationalism and oil nationalization; and the long-distance machinery of an international corporation. Her account shows that the politics of oil cannot be understood in isolation from its technical dimensions.
540 _aCreative Commons
_fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
_2cc
_4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
546 _aEnglish
650 7 _aImpact of science & technology on society
_2bicssc
650 7 _aHistory of engineering & technology
_2bicssc
653 _aIran
653 _aBritish Petroleum
653 _aOil
653 _aInfrastructure
653 _aTrans-national corporation
653 _aDemocracy
653 _aTechno-science
653 _aScience and Technology Studies
653 _aMiddle East
653 _aSocio-technical system
653 _aOil Concession
653 _aAnglo-Iranian Oil Company
653 _aBritish Admiralty
653 _aSheikh Khaz'al
653 _aStandardization
653 _aNatural resources
653 _aPetroleum expertise
653 _aOil cartel
653 _aNationalism
653 _acommunism
653 _arace
653 _alabor
653 _aoil nationalization
653 _aboycott
653 _aoil consortium
653 _aenergy crisis
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttp://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262037044
_70
_zDOAB: download the publication
856 4 0 _awww.oapen.org
_uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/77937
_70
_zDOAB: description of the publication
999 _c81120
_d81120