000			01886naaaa2200241uu 4500
001			https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63332
005			20220220105717.0
020			_a05.3:2017.2.1
024	7		_a10.25364/05.3:2017.2.1 _cdoi
041	0		_aEnglish
042			_adc
100	1		_aLarissa Soares Carneiro _4auth
245	1	0	_aEmulating Science. The Rhetorical Figures of Creationism : Emulating Science
260			_bSchüren Verlag _c2017
300			_a1 electronic resource (53-64 p.)
506	0		_aOpen Access _2star _fUnrestricted online access
520			_aThis article compares forms of visual argumentation in the scientific study of evolution and Young-Earth Creationism, arguing that secular forms of scientific representation have affected the way creationists visually construct their own. In order to affirm their view of the origin of the universe, creationists borrow from, mimic, and ultimately emulate the techniques, or at least the appearance, of scientific method and reasoning. The use of the word “emulation” is very deliberate since their aim is to match and surpass a rival scientific paradigm – evolution. The sermon preached by the design of the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky, is not content simply to look like science, but aims to do science that is affirmed by the Scriptures.
540			_aCreative Commons _fhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ _2cc _4https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
546			_aEnglish
773	1	0	_0OAPEN Library ID: 47030 _tUsing Media in Religious Studies. Strategies of Representing Religion in Scholarly Approaches _7nnaa
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://jrfm.eu/index.php/ojs_jrfm/article/view/103 _70 _zDOAB: download the publication
856	4	0	_awww.oapen.org _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63332 _70 _zDOAB: description of the publication
999			_c82645 _d82645